Choc v. HudBay Minerals Inc. & Caal v. HudBay Minerals Inc.
Lawsuits against Canadian company HudBay Minerals Inc. over human rights abuse in Guatemala
Skip to content
  • About
  • The Lawsuits
    • Summary
      • Choc v. HudBay
      • Chub v. HudBay
      • Caal v. HudBay
    • Why sue in Canada?
    • Legal Documents
    • Case comments
  • Canadian Mining in El Estor
  • A Canadian Problem
  • News & Multimedia
    • News
    • Photographs
    • Case comments
  • Donate
  • Contact
  • Español

Case comments by corporate law firms

Norton Rose Fulbright: Corporate social responsibility: a new era of transnational corporate liability for human rights violations?

Baker & McKenzie: Ontario Judgment Opens Door to Increased Risk for Canadian Mining Companies Working Abroad

Bennett Jones: A Warning for Canadian Corporations with Foreign Subsidiaries

Osler, Hoskin, & Harcourt: Ontario Court Gives Green Light to International Human Rights Tort Claims in Choc v. Hudbay Minerals Inc.

Torys: Resource Companies Face Risk of Litigation in Canada Relating to Foreign Operations

Gowlings: Enhanced liability abroad for Canadian corporations

McMillan: Canadian Mining Companies: Is There Liability In Canadian Courts For Activity In Foreign Countries? 

Foley Hoag: ATS of the North? Canadian Court Allows Suit to Continue for Human Rights Abuses Committed Abroad

Lancaster House: Canadian mining company can be sued in Canada for violence in foreign countries, judge rules

Heenan Blaikie: Commentary: Guatemalans’ lawsuit against Hudbay in Canada

Comments are closed.

© 2023 Klippensteins, Barristers & Solicitors